The Glenstone Museum and Architectural Legal Issues

Architecture is a form of art that surrounds us, from the homes we live in to the skyscrapers that create skylines. Architecture shapes our daily experiences and influences our quality of life. This beautiful form of art is however impacted by many regulations, which you might not have realized. To learn more about legal issues surrounding architecture, we interviewed Michael Trudeau. From this interview, it became clear that intellectual property holds less significance when it comes to building museums, hospitals, or schools than other types of architecture.

About Michael Trudeau and The Glenstone Museum:

The Glenstone Museum is a privately-owned museum owned by billionaire Mitchell Rales. Rales decided to create the Glenstone Museum after he had a near-death experience when his chartered helicopter exploded during a refueling stop (Dumbarton Oaks, n.d.). After the incident, he realized art makes him feel alive and he wanted to create a “legacy through art” (Dumbarton Oaks, n.d.), so he began turning his home in Potomac into the Glenstone Museum.  

Michael Trudeau is a Director at Thomas Phifer and Partners. Micheal played a pivotal role in creating the Glenstone Museum located in Potomac, MD. The Glenstone Museum features both indoor and outdoor spaces featuring contemporary art. The outdoor exhibit features sculptures within its outdoor walking path. The Glenstone Museum really stands out due to its integration of art along with the environment, making it a very unique museum. Michael described why the Glenstone Museum was his favorite project to work on. 

Intellectual Property Relating to The Glenstone Museum

We asked Micheal whether Intellectual Property and lawsuits are common in his work, however we learned Intellectual Property is not a large focus for architects that work on projects like his.

Copyright infringement comes in many forms, and some instances of infringement are easier to prove than others.  One interesting question is if and when artistic inspiration derived from another’s copyrighted work amounts to infringement. One popular example is when Marvin Gaye’s estate sued Robin Thicke and Pharell Williams due to the similarity of “Blurred Lines” with Marvin’s song “Got to Give It Up”. In this popular case, Marvin Gaye’s estate was able to win the lawsuit due to substantial similarity, but that result was controversial in the music industry.  

Intellectual Property at The Glenstone Museum

Using the Glenstone Museum as an example, we asked Micheal about intellectual property protection within architecture. So if copyright infringement occurs, that would mean that one of the six rights of a copyright owner were infringed. Understanding the rights is crucial, since it regulates how architectural designs are legally protected and shared within the industry. 

We asked how AI could potentially impact intellectual property. Since AI could create a sketch of a building, it could create questions and problems of ownership. If AI tools are used to design buildings, it could lead to disputes over who holds the copyright to those designs: the architects, or the AI technology used. 

Circular 41: Copyright Protection for Architectural Works

Circular 41, issued by the US Copyright Office, explains the copyright protections for architectural works. This Circular provides guidance as to what is protected under US copyright law after the Copyright Act of 1990, which granted copyright protection to architectural works. Here’s a summary of some things that Circular 41 tells us: 

  • Circular 41 explains that copyright in architecture includes the building’s design as shown in plans, drawings, or actual buildings, and it protects the design from unauthorized copying or derivative works. 

  • The protection for architectural works does not protect functional elements or standard features, such as common shapes. 

  • For a work to be protected, it must be original and must contain a bit of creativity. 

  • Describes how architects can register their works with the Copyright Office. 

  • In addition, the duration of copyrights is the life of the author plus 70 years, or for works made for hire, 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter.

What If There Are Similar Buildings to The Glenstone Museum?

Michael acknowledged that there are buildings that resemble the Glenstone Museum, but he felt proving copyright infringement in the type of architecture he practices is difficult. If another firm had copied their designs, he felt it would be extremely difficult to prove that the firm had done so, and Thomas Phifer and Partners could end up spending more money on litigation than they would receive. This highlights the challenges of enforcing architectural copyrights in some situations where buildings resemble one another.  

References

Photos courtesy of Michael Trudeau.

U.S. Copyright Office. (2021). Copyright registration of websites and website content (Circular 41). https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ41.pdf

Dumbarton Oaks. (n.d.). Glenstone. https://www.doaks.org/resources/cultural-philanthropy/glenstone